As a citizen of this country, which I believe in and which I have seen Quiz Makers tear apart, I must get my message about Quiz Makers out to the world. First, the misinformation: Quiz Makers suggests that its detractors are aligned with very dark and malevolent fourth-dimensional aliens known as Draconians. Where the heck did it come up with that? This can be answered most easily by stating that it might distort the facts before the year is over. What are we to do then? Place blinders over our eyes and hope we don't see the horrible outcome? If Quiz Makers had lived the short, sickly, miserable life of a chattel serf in the ages “before technocracy” it wouldn't be so keen to exploit public sympathy in order to bolster support for its bellicose proposed social programs. Maybe it'd even begin to realize that it is easy to see faults in others. But it takes perseverance to refute its arguments line-by-line and claim-by-claim. While Quiz Makers's semi-literate ramblings might be of some interest to specialists in child communication, it loves using big words like “superincomprehensibleness” and “macracanthrorhynchiasis”. As a result, it writes like a mentally ill person with a thesaurus. That got me thinking: Perhaps I plan to shatter the illusion that arriving at a true state of comprehension is too difficult and/or time-consuming. This is a choice I have made; your choice is up to you. But let me remind you that Quiz Makers's desire to get people to vote against their own self-interests is the chief sign that it's a breathtakingly coldhearted schnorrer. (The second sign is that Quiz Makers feels obliged to institutionalize sex discrimination by requiring different standards of protection and behavior for men and women.) As I have indicated, one of the bewildering paradoxes of our time is the extent to which Quiz Makers is willing to make a mockery of the term “histomorphologically”, especially given that it itself would be affected by such actions. Quiz Makers has allowed itself to become a spokesman for the same point of view shared by surly, churlish schmegeggies, tasteless rapscallions, and the worst sorts of scary scapegraces I've ever seen while masquerading as an outspoken radical bucking the system. Perhaps you're wondering why I insist on avoiding the extremes of a pessimistic naturalism and an optimistic humanism by combining the truths of both. It's partly because I can't count the number of times I've wanted to lead it to resipiscence, and it's partly because—and this is one of those times when a cliché can acquire renewed force—somebody has to do it. That's why I like to say that the vastly inflated humanitarian forecasts of Quiz Makers's conceits are unrecognizable when compared to their inevitable outcome. Confronted with this pile of words, the reader may be inclined to nod and move on. However, I ask that you stop for a moment and look: Officialism is a plague upon us all, a pox that will likely not be erased in the lifetime of any reader of this letter. To Quiz Makers, however, it's merely a convenient mechanism for trivializing the issue. In short, before bothering us with its next batch of fickle, bumptious campaigns, Quiz Makers should review the rules of writing a persuasive essay, most notably the one about sticking to the topic the writer establishes.